The Tourism Boom That Changed Berlin: A Decade of Growth, Crisis, and Questions
- Mads Weisbjerg Rasmussen
- Dec 4
- 6 min read

Picture Berlin in 2015. The city feels alive but raw—neighborhoods are still claiming their identities, streets smell like authentic chaos rather than sanitized tourism. Around 12.7 million visitors came that year. It seemed like a lot. But something was about to shift dramatically, and by 2019, Berlin would welcome nearly 14 million visitors annually. Today, we're asking ourselves a harder question: was that growth good for Berlin, or did it just make the city busier while pushing locals further away?
We investigated Berlin's tourism trajectory over the last decade—not just the numbers, but what those numbers actually did to the city. What we discovered is a story about how tourism can transform a place so completely that locals barely recognize their own neighborhoods anymore.
The Explosive Years: When Everyone Discovered Berlin (2015-2019)
Between 2015 and 2019, Berlin experienced one of Europe's most dramatic tourism booms. Visitor numbers grew year over year, and by 2019, the city had reached its peak: nearly 14 million tourists generating €16.9 billion in spending. That's not just growth—that's a transformation.
Why Berlin, suddenly? A few things happened at once. Low-cost airlines like EasyJet made Berlin accessible and cheap. Instagram made it aesthetically appealing. The city's narrative as "poor but sexy"—a place where you could live cheaply, party freely, and discover authentic culture—spread globally. Berlin became synonymous with cool, and cool travels fast.
What we found striking in researching this: it wasn't just about the major attractions. Yes, the Brandenburg Gate and Museum Island drew millions. But the real explosion happened in neighborhoods. Kreuzberg, Friedrichshain, Neukölln—these weren't supposed to be tourist destinations. They were working-class, immigrant-heavy, politically radical. That was exactly why tourists loved them. They felt real. Authentic. Untouched.
Except they weren't untouched. Tourism had a business model behind it, and that business model was about to reshape the entire city.
The Housing Crisis: When Tourism Became Gentrification
Here's where the story gets complicated. Around the same time tourism exploded, something else happened: short-term rental platforms like Airbnb fundamentally changed how Berliners could afford to live.
We researched the data, and what we found was striking. In 2016, research showed that approximately 5,500 Berlin apartments were being used illegally as short-term tourist rentals—removed from the long-term housing market. That doesn't sound massive until you realize Berlin has a chronic housing shortage. When landlords can earn €2,500 per month from tourism instead of €1,000 from a long-term tenant, the math is brutal. Apartments that might have housed families were suddenly generating tourist income.
The consequence? Rent spiraled. In neighborhoods with high concentrations of Airbnb listings—Mitte, Friedrichshain, Tiergarten—rents didn't just go up. They climbed at rates that locals simply couldn't match. Long-time residents who'd lived cheaply in Berlin suddenly faced impossible choices: move to the outer districts or leave the city entirely.
This wasn't accidental. It was the visible side effect of tourism economics. Neighborhoods transformed visibly: small independent shops were replaced by phone-charging stations and souvenir stands. Turkish bakeries became Instagram-friendly coffee shops. The people who made these neighborhoods distinctive were being priced out.
Kreuzberg saw this most acutely. In 2011, the neighborhood had already articulated clear anti-tourism sentiment—residents made international headlines protesting against visitors. But the real pressure came later, when tourism combined with housing scarcity became a gentrification machine. The people who created the culture that tourists came to experience couldn't afford to stay and experience it themselves.
When It All Stopped: The Pandemic Pause (2020-2021)
Then COVID-19 arrived, and Berlin's tourism collapsed. In 2020, visitor numbers dropped 64%—from nearly 14 million to roughly 5 million. For the first time in a decade, the city breathed.
What happened next was interesting. When tourists disappeared, so did some pressure. Short-term rental platforms couldn't operate the same way. Housing became slightly more available. Neighborhoods reclaimed themselves, even temporarily. Locals could walk through Kreuzberg or Mitte without navigating crowds of backpackers. The city felt like a place for residents again, not just visitors.
But here's what's crucial: this pause revealed something about Berlin's relationship with tourism. The city had built significant economic dependence on it. Hotels employ thousands. Museums depend on ticket revenue. Restaurants, bars, shops—the entire service economy had oriented itself around visitors. When tourism stopped, Berlin's economy suffered visibly.
By 2021-2022, something became clear: Berlin needed tourism to work financially. But it also desperately needed housing to work for residents. These two needs were in direct conflict.
The Recovery: A City Learning (or Not) (2022-2025)
Tourism began recovering in 2022, and by 2024, Berlin had welcomed 12.7 million visitors again—nearly back to pre-pandemic levels. In 2024 alone, visitors spent €17 billion. That's €17 billion flowing into hotels, restaurants, museums, and the broader economy.
We researched 2025 data carefully, and here's what we found: international arrivals have actually started declining. In the first half of 2025, Berlin saw roughly 6 million visitors—down slightly from the same period in 2024. Hotel occupancy rates slipped to 52.8%, the lowest in recent years. There are fewer tourists now than there were a year ago.
What changed? A few things seem to be happening simultaneously. First, cities across Europe face overtourism pushback. Barcelona, Venice, Amsterdam—they've all begun implementing restrictions. Berlin has watched these conversations and started its own regulations around short-term rentals. Since 2018, the city has gotten stricter about Airbnb. Entire apartments can now only be rented for limited periods, and the rules have been tightened further.
Second, traveler behavior is shifting. Long-haul destinations that were closed during the pandemic are now open again. Some of the surge to Berlin was partly because other places weren't accessible. Now it is.
But here's what's important: the housing pressure hasn't disappeared. Rents are still high. Neighborhoods are still transformed. Tourism's impact doesn't vanish when visitor numbers decline—it's baked into the infrastructure, the rents, the character of neighborhoods.
What Changed in a Decade: Berlin's New Layers
If you visit Berlin now versus 2015, what you see is genuinely different. In the best way and the hardest way.
The best way: Berlin's tourism infrastructure has matured. Museums have better exhibitions. Hotels range from backpacker hostels to luxury properties. Restaurants have gotten more ambitious. The city has learned to handle millions of visitors while maintaining neighborhoods worth visiting.
The hardest way: Berlin's original character—the scrappy, countercultural, "poor but sexy" Berlin that drew people in the first place—is increasingly harder to find. The neighborhoods that were authentic in 2015 have been transformed by their own authenticity. Success became its own trap.
Walk through Kreuzberg or Prenzlauer Berg now. You'll see incredible places. You'll also see a homogenization that comes with gentrification. The radical bookshops, squatter communities, and artist collectives that defined these neighborhoods have been replaced by boutiques, Instagram-friendly cafes, and young professionals.
This isn't unique to Berlin—it's happening in Barcelona, Amsterdam, Prague, and every city that tourism "discovers." But Berlin's transformation feels particularly acute because tourism came so fast and so intensely.
The Real Question: Who Is Berlin For?
Here's what we kept thinking while researching this: is more tourism good? The answer isn't simple.
Tourism brings money—€17 billion annually is genuinely significant for a city. It creates jobs. It supports museums, galleries, and cultural institutions that would struggle without visitor revenue. It brings global attention to Berlin's art scene, history, and creative energy.
But tourism also transforms a place. It pushes locals out. It transforms neighborhoods into products. It creates an economy where a coffee costs €6 instead of €2 because it's in a "cool" district. It means that the people who actually created the culture that tourists came to experience can no longer afford to stay.
And here's the harder truth: once tourism starts reshaping a city, it's nearly impossible to reverse. You can regulate Airbnb, implement visitor taxes, restrict hotel growth—all things Berlin has tried. But the neighborhoods have already changed. The rents are already high. The original residents have already left.
Looking Forward: Can Berlin Find Balance?
Berlin's slight tourism decline in 2025 is interesting, but we shouldn't misread it. It doesn't mean the city has solved its tourism-gentrification problem. It just means visitor numbers are stabilizing, not exploding. Rents aren't dropping because fewer tourists visit in June.
What Berlin seems to be learning—slowly—is that sustainable tourism means accepting fewer visitors and protecting neighborhood character more fiercely. It means being selective about who profits from tourism. It means prioritizing long-term residents over short-term rental income.
Some cities are doing this. Amsterdam and Barcelona have started implementing caps on tourist accommodations. Berlin is moving in that direction, but the regulations came late. The damage to neighborhood character, housing availability, and resident displacement is already done.
For travelers, this means Berlin in 2025 is different from Berlin in 2015. It's more polished, more expensive, more accessible—and simultaneously, it's become slightly less distinctly itself. The very things that made Berlin worth visiting have been partially consumed by the act of visiting.
That's not a criticism—it's just how cities work when millions of people discover them. The question is whether Berlin can hold onto enough of what made it valuable in the first place, while still welcoming visitors who genuinely want to understand it.
Based on what we've researched, Berlin is trying. But the clock on authenticity was ticking long ago.



Comments